Case LawHigh Court › Decided On: 21.12.2022 v. Commissioner O...

Decided On: 21.12.2022 v. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals) & Ors

High Court 21 Dec 2022 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · cmis
Parties
Decided On: 21.12.2022 v. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals) & Ors
Date of order
21 Dec 2022
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Allowed

Case summary

In Decided On: 21.12.2022 v. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals) & Ors, the High Court (2022) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Issue: Whether approved for reporting?[ 1] For the Petitioner : Mr.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH,SHIMLA. CWP No. 8135 of 2022 Decided on: 21.12.2022 Punjab National Bank…Petitioner Versus Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) & Ors. …Respondents Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Tarlok Singh Chauhan, Judge.Hon’ble Mr. Justice Virender Singh, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?[ 1] For the Petitioner : Mr. Sahil Malhotra, Advocate. For the Respondents :Mr. Vinay Kuthiala, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Diwan Negi, Advocate. Tarlok Singh Chauhan, Judge (Oral) Learned counsel for the petitioner states that heis under instructions not to press the instant petitionprovided liberty is granted to approach competent authority.2.Since the petition is at the threshold andmoreover the request is otherwise innocuous, the same isacceded. 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? yes 3.Consequently, the instant petition is disposed ofas not pressed with liberty as aforesaid. It is made clear thatthe time spent in this litigation shall not come in way of thepetitioner to approach the competent authority. (Tarlok Singh Chauhan) Judge (Virender Singh) Judge 21[st] December, 2022 (sanjeev)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan