Case LawHigh Court › Decided On 27.11.2014 v. Commissioner Of...

Decided On 27.11.2014 v. Commissioner Of Income Tax

High Court 27 Nov 2014 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · cmis
Parties
Decided On 27.11.2014 v. Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
27 Nov 2014
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Allowed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Decided On 27.11.2014 v. Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2014) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Issue: Justice Sureshwar Thakur, Judge Whether approved for reporting? [1] ____________________________________________________________________ For the Appellant : Mr.

Decision: In view of the above, the present appeal is disposed of, so also the pending applications, if any.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. ITA No. 11/2011 Decided on 27.11.2014 ____________________________________________________________________ M/s Ashoka Alloy Steels Ltd. ………..Appellant ………..Appellant Versus ……….Respondent Commissioner of Income Tax ____________________________________________________________________ Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sureshwar Thakur, Judge Whether approved for reporting? [1] ____________________________________________________________________ For the Appellant : Mr. Vishal Mohan, Advocate. For the Respondent : Mr. Vinay Kuthiala, Senior Advocate with Ms. Vandana Kuthiala, Advocate. ____________________________________________________________________ Rajiv Sharma, Judge It is jointly represented by the learned counsel for the parties that the substantial questions of law raised in the appeal are covered by definitive law laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India in a judgment reported in 293ITR226. The substantial questions raised in the present appeal are thus answered accordingly. Impugned order dated 20.5.2005 (Annexure A) passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, is set aside. It is made clear by way of abundant precaution that the assessee shall be liable to pay interest till date the payment is made to the respondent-Department, in accordance with law. 2. In view of the above, the present appeal is disposed of, so also the pending applications, if any. (Rajiv Sharma) Judge November 27, 2014 (vikrant) (Sureshwar Thakur) Judge 1Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan