Decided On: 6[Th] July, 2021 v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax …
High Court
06 Jul 2021 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · cmis
Parties
Decided On: 6[Th] July, 2021 v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax …
Date of order
06 Jul 2021
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Decided On: 6[Th] July, 2021 v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax …, the High Court (2021) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Issue: Whether approved for reporting? ______________________________________________________ For the Appellant:Mr.Vishal Mohan, Advocate.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA
ITA No.1 of 2015 a/w ITA Nos.2to 7 of 2015, 101 to 104, 106,107 of 2018 and 9 and 10 of2020
Decided on: 6[th] July, 2021
____________________________________________________________
Versus
Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax …..Respondent7.ITA No.7 of 2015Rajesh Popli…..AppellantRajesh Popli…..Appellant
Versus
Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax …..Respondent8.ITA No.101 of 2018Rajesh Popli…..AppellantRajesh Popli…..Appellant
Versus
Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax …..Respondent
9.ITA No.102 of 2018Rajesh Popli…..AppellantRajesh Popli…..Appellant
Versus
Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax …..Respondent10.ITA No.103 of 2018Rajesh Popli…..AppellantRajesh Popli…..Appellant
Versus
Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax …..Respondent11.ITA No.104 of 2018Rajesh Popli…..AppellantRajesh Popli…..Appellant
Versus
Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax …..Respondent
12.ITA No.106 of 2018Rajesh Popli…..AppellantRajesh Popli…..Appellant
Versus
Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax …..Respondent13.ITA No.107 of 2018Rajesh Popli…..AppellantRajesh Popli…..Appellant
Versus
Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax …..Respondent14.ITA No.9 of 2020Rajesh Popli…..Appellant
Versus
Principal Commissioner of Income …..Respondent15.ITA No.10 of 2020Rajesh Popli…..Appellant
Versus
Principal Commissioner of Income …..Respondent
_____________________________________________________________
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ravi Malimath, Acting Chief Justice.
Hon’ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge.
Whether approved for reporting?
______________________________________________________
For the Appellant:Mr.Vishal Mohan, Advocate.
For the respondent:
Mr. Vinay Kuthiala, Senior Advocatewith Ms. Vandana Kuthiala, Advocate.
(Through Video Conferencing)
Ravi Malimath, Acting Chief Justice(Oral)
OMP No.257 of 2021 in ITA No.1 of 2015
OMP No.254 of 2021 in ITA No.2 of 2015OMP No.255 of 2021 in ITA No.3 of 2015OMP No.256 of 2021 in ITA No.4 of 2015OMP No.252 of 2021 in ITA No.5 of 2015
–--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
OMP No.253 of 2021 in ITA No.6 of 2015OMP No.251 of 2021 in ITA No.7 of 2015OMP No.249 of 2021 in ITA No.101 of 2018OMP No.248 of 2021 in ITA No.102 of 2018OMP No.250 of 2021 in ITA No.103 of 2018OMP No.247 of 2021 in ITA No.104 of 2018OMP No.246 of 2021 in ITA No.106 of 2018OMP No.245 of 2021 in ITA No.107 of 2018OMP No.243 of 2021 in ITA No.9 of 2020OMP No.244 of 2021 in ITA No.10 of 2020
For the reasons assigned in the applications, theappeals are dismissed as withdrawn. The applications are disposedof accordingly.
( Ravi Malimath ) Acting Chief Justice
July 06, 2021(Bhardwaj/vt)
( Jyotsna Rewal Dua ) Judge
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue