Case LawHigh Court › Deepa Kapoor v. Assistant Commissioner O...

Deepa Kapoor v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax

High Court 31 May 2016 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · dhcdb
Parties
Deepa Kapoor v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
31 May 2016
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Allowed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Deepa Kapoor v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2016) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI 17. + W.P.(C) 5302/2016 DEEPA KAPOOR ..... Petitioner Through: Mr N. P. Sahni, Advocate. versus ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ..... Respondent Through: Mr Zoheb Hossain, Senior Standing counsel with Mr Deepak Anand, Junior Standing counsel. CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU O R D E R% 31.05.2016 CM No. 22162/2016 (for exemption) 1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. W.P.(C) 5302/2016 & CM No. 22161/2016 (for interim directions) 2. The challenge in this petition is to the assessment order dated 19[th] May, 2016 passed by the Assessing Officer (‘AO’) under Section 263/143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for the Assessment Year (‘AY’) 2012-13. 3. Mr N. P. Sahni, learned counsel for the Petitioner states that although the Petitioner has the of an appeal before the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) [‘CIT(A)’], in view of the apparent errors in the impugned order, W.P.(C) 5302/2016 Page 1 of 2 this Court should entertain this writ petition. 4. The Court has heard Mr Sahni at some length. The Court does not wish to express any view on the grounds urged in this petition, since in the considered view of the Court, the Petitioner should avail the statutory remedy available to her in accordance with law. In that view of the matter, the writ petition is dismissed, leaving open the ground raised in this petition to be urged before the CIT (A), apart from any other grounds of challenge that the Petitioner may have against the impugned assessment order. S. MURALIDHAR, J MAY 31, 2016 MK VIBHU BAKHRU, J W.P.(C) 5302/2016 Page 2 of 2
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan