Case Law › High Court › Dehradun And Another v. Reading And Bate...

Dehradun And Another v. Reading And Bates Exploration Company

High Court 08 Dec 2003 In favour of: Unclear

Forum / Bench

High Court · ukhcucis_pg

Parties

Date of order

08 Dec 2003

Assessment year(s)

1993-1994

Outcome

Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Dehradun And Another v. Reading And Bates Exploration Company, the High Court (2003) decided the matter.

Decision: Appeal is accordingly disposed of.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARANCHAL AT NAINITAL Income Tax Appeal No. 51 of 2003 The Commissioner of Income Tax, Dehradun and another ............. Appellants Versus Reading and Bates Exploration Company As agent of Mr. J.E. Macdonald, New Delhi .............. Respondent Mr. S.K. Posti, Advocate for the Appellants. None for the respondent. Coram: Hon’ble S.H. Kapadia, C.J. Hon’ble M.M. Ghildiyal, J. Date: 08.12.2003 PC:- This appeal concerns assessment Year 1993-1994. None appears for the respondent though served. In view of the judgment of this Court dated 9[th] October 2003 in the case of Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Sedco Forex International Drilling Company Ltd. in Income Tax Appeal No. 57 of 2002 and others, question No. (A) is answered in favour of the revenue and against the assessee and question No. (B) is answered in favour of the assessee and against the revenue. Appeal is accordingly disposed of. (M.M. Ghildiyal, J.) (S.H. Kapadia, C.J.) HN

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.