Case Law › High Court › Dehradun, And One Another. ………… v. Mahar...

Dehradun, And One Another. ………… v. Maharaja Manvendra Shah …………

High Court 30 Aug 2003 In favour of: Unclear

Forum / Bench

High Court · ukhcucis_pg

Parties

Date of order

30 Aug 2003

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Dehradun, And One Another. ………… v. Maharaja Manvendra Shah …………, the High Court (2003) dismissed the appeal.

Decision: If the reference number is not supplied within eight weeks from toady, this appeal will stand automatically dismissed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARANCHAL AT NAINITAL Income Tax Appeal No. 75 of 2002 Commissioner of Income Tax, Dehradun, and one another. …………. Appellants Versus Maharaja Manvendra Shah ………… Respondents Mr. S.K. Posti, Advocate for the Appellant None for the respondents. Coram: Hon. S.H. Kapadia, C.J. Hon. Irshad Hussain, J. Dated: 30.08.2003: PC: List this appeal only after the department gives the reference number in a connected matter. If the reference number is not supplied within eight weeks from toady, this appeal will stand automatically dismissed. (Irshad Hussain, J.) (S.H. Kapadia, C.J.) AK:

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.