Delhi-3 v. Anita Rani Mahajan
High Court
04 Feb 2020 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · dhcdb
Parties
Delhi-3 v. Anita Rani Mahajan
Date of order
04 Feb 2020
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
Case summary
In Delhi-3 v. Anita Rani Mahajan, the High Court (2020) allowed the appeal.
Decision: 3,82,576/-, the present appeal is disposed of as not pressed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
$~42.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+ WTA 1/2020
PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,
DELHI-3 ..... Petitioner Through: Ms. Vibhooti Malhotra and Mr.Shailendera Singh, Advocates. Through: Ms. Vibhooti Malhotra and Mr.Shailendera Singh, Advocates.
versus
ANITA RANI MAHAJAN
Through:
..... Respondent
Mr. Salil Kapoor, Mr. Sumit Lalchandani and Ms. Soumya Singh, Advocates. Lalchandani and Ms. Soumya Singh, Advocates.
CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULA
O R D E R% 04.02.2020
C.M. No. 4420/2020
Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions.
The application stands disposed of.
WTA 1/2020 and C.M. Nos. 4421-22/2020
In the light of the Circular No.5/2019 dated 05.02.2019 issued by the Ministry of Finance, Department of Revenue, Central Board of Direct Taxes (Judicial Section), Government of India, which fixes the monetary limit in respect of tax effect, inter alia, before the High Court in which the Department could pursue the matter as Rs. 1,00,00,000/- and in view of the
fact that the tax effect in the present case is Rs. 3,82,576/-, the present appeal is disposed of as not pressed.
VIPIN SANGHI, J
FEBRUARY 04, 2020 B.S. Rohella
SANJEEV NARULA, J
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.