Case LawHigh Court › Delhi-3 v. Anita Rani Mahajan

Delhi-3 v. Anita Rani Mahajan

High Court 04 Feb 2020 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · dhcdb
Parties
Delhi-3 v. Anita Rani Mahajan
Date of order
04 Feb 2020
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Allowed

Case summary

In Delhi-3 v. Anita Rani Mahajan, the High Court (2020) allowed the appeal.

Decision: 3,82,576/-, the present appeal is disposed of as not pressed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

$~42. IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + WTA 1/2020 PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, DELHI-3 ..... Petitioner Through: Ms. Vibhooti Malhotra and Mr.Shailendera Singh, Advocates. Through: Ms. Vibhooti Malhotra and Mr.Shailendera Singh, Advocates. versus ANITA RANI MAHAJAN Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Salil Kapoor, Mr. Sumit Lalchandani and Ms. Soumya Singh, Advocates. Lalchandani and Ms. Soumya Singh, Advocates. CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULA O R D E R% 04.02.2020 C.M. No. 4420/2020 Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The application stands disposed of. WTA 1/2020 and C.M. Nos. 4421-22/2020 In the light of the Circular No.5/2019 dated 05.02.2019 issued by the Ministry of Finance, Department of Revenue, Central Board of Direct Taxes (Judicial Section), Government of India, which fixes the monetary limit in respect of tax effect, inter alia, before the High Court in which the Department could pursue the matter as Rs. 1,00,00,000/- and in view of the fact that the tax effect in the present case is Rs. 3,82,576/-, the present appeal is disposed of as not pressed. VIPIN SANGHI, J FEBRUARY 04, 2020 B.S. Rohella SANJEEV NARULA, J
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan