Case Law › High Court › Delhi Development Authority Through: Mr....

Delhi Development Authority Through: Mr. Amol Sinha, Advocate v. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Exemption

High Court 23 Mar 2018 In favour of: Revenue

Forum / Bench

High Court · dhcdb

Parties

Date of order

23 Mar 2018

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Delhi Development Authority Through: Mr. Amol Sinha, Advocate v. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Exemption, the High Court (2018) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: In view of the statement made, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty as prayed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

$~5 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 1998/2018 & CM No.8217/2018 DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY Through: Mr. Amol Sinha, Advocate ..... Petitioner versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTION)... Respondent Through: Mr. Zoheb Hossain, Senior Standing Counsel & Mr. Deepak Anand, Junior Standing Counsel CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDER SHEKHAR O R D E R % 23.03.2018 Learned counsel for the petitioner, on instructions, seeks permission to withdraw the present writ petition, with liberty to initiate appropriate proceedings, if required and necessary. In view of the statement made, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty as prayed. CM No.8217/2018 is also dismissed as withdrawn. SANJIV KHANNA, J MARCH 23, 2018/tp CHANDER SHEKHAR, J

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.