In Delhi-I v. M/S Cimco Birla Ltd, the High Court (2006) allowed the appeal.
Decision: In view of the withdrawal of the appeal, the motion does not survive and the same stands disposed of.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 182 OF 2003
WITH
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1068 OF 2003
The Commissioner of Income Tax,
Delhi-I. .. Appellant
V/s
M/s CIMCO Birla Ltd. .. Respondent
Mr.A.N. Kotangale for the Appellant.
None for the Respondent.
CORAM : H.L. GOKHALE & J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATE : 22ND AUGUST 2006
P.C.
P.C. :
1. Heard Mr.Kotangale in support of this Appeal.
He fairly states that the issue, which is sought to be
raised, is covered in favour of the assessee in C.I.T.v. Indo Nippon Chemicals Co. Ltd. - 261 I.T.R. 275.
He therefore seeks to withdraw the Appeal. Appeal is
allowed to be withdrawn. Refund of court fees as per
rules.
2. In view of the withdrawal of the appeal, the
motion does not survive and the same stands disposed of.
(H.L. GOKHALE, J.)
- 2 -
(J.P. DEVADHAR J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.