Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Bhilai Engineering Corporation Ltd
High Court
28 Nov 2018 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · cghccisdb
Parties
Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Bhilai Engineering Corporation Ltd
Date of order
28 Nov 2018
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Bhilai Engineering Corporation Ltd, the High Court (2018) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: The appeal therefore stands dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
Tax Case (Income Tax Appeal) No. 149 of 2017
NAFR
Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, 32/32 Bungalow, Bhilai District Durg, Chhattisgarh.
---- Appellant
Versus
Bhilai Engineering Corporation Ltd. 39/2, Nehru Nagar, Bhilai, District Durg, Chhattisgarh.
---- RespondentFor Appellant: Ms. Naushina Ali, Advocate.For Respondent: None
Hon'ble Shri Ajay Kumar Tripathi, Chief JusticeHon'ble Shri Parth Prateem Sahu, Judge
Judgment on Board
28/11/2018
Per Ajay Kumar Tripathi, Chief Justice
1. Having heard learned counsel for the Appellant/Revenue and having perused the record, since the concurrent findings of fact given by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) as well as the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal cannot be re-opened and re-looked into as those are concluded findings and nothing in terms of error in relation to the view so taken by the two forums emerge, we are of the opinion that no significant question of law as such is made out to interfere with the impugned decision or decisions.
2. The appeal therefore stands dismissed.
Sd/-
(Ajay Kumar Tripathi)
CHIEF JUSTICE
(Parth Prateem Sahu)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.