Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central Circle-1, Patna v. Sri Tripurari Mohan Prasad, Samarpan House Sheikhpura, Patna
High Court
04 Mar 2013 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · patnahcucisdb94
Parties
Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central Circle-1, Patna v. Sri Tripurari Mohan Prasad, Samarpan House Sheikhpura, Patna
Date of order
04 Mar 2013
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central Circle-1, Patna v. Sri Tripurari Mohan Prasad, Samarpan House Sheikhpura, Patna, the High Court (2013) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
7 04-03-2013
Mahesh/-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNAMiscellaneous Appeal No.278 of 2007
======================================================
1.Commissioner of Income Tax, Central, Patna
2.Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle-1, Patna
.... .... Appellant/s
Versus
Sri Tripurari Mohan Prasad, Samarpan House Sheikhpura, Patna.
.... .... Respondent/s
====================================================== Appearance :For the Appellant/s : Mr. Harshwardhan Prasad and Mr. Rishi Raj Sinha, Advs.
For the Respondent/s :
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN SINHAand
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY
ORAL ORDER
(Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN SINHA)
Heard learned counsel for the appellants and the
respondent.
The discussion in paragraph 6 of the order of the
Tribunal is reasoned and well considered. If the Assessing Officer did not respond to the query of the C.I.T.(A), it is for the respondent to answer their own deficiency.
We are satisfied on the reasoning contained in the said paragraph that the appeal does not raise any substantial question of law for our consideration.
The appeal is dismissed.
(Navin Sinha, J)
(Shivaji Pandey,J)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.