Case LawHigh Court › Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, Centr...

Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central Circle-4, Patna v. Ranjan Kumar Singh, Flat

High Court 15 Mar 2016 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · patnahcucisdb94
Parties
Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central Circle-4, Patna v. Ranjan Kumar Singh, Flat
Date of order
15 Mar 2016
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central Circle-4, Patna v. Ranjan Kumar Singh, Flat, the High Court (2016) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed as not maintainable.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Appeal No.729 of 2014 =========================================================== Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle-4, Patna. .... .... Appellant Versus Ranjan Kumar Singh, Flat No. 1402, Trishul Apartment, Koshambi, Ghaziabad .... .... Respondent =========================================================== Appearance : For the Appellant : Mrs. Archana Sinha @ Archana Shahi, Advocate Mr. Alok Kumar, Advocate Ms. Shalini Bihari, Advocate For the Respondent : None =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA And HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAMESH KUMAR DATTA ORAL JUDGMENT (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA)Date: 15-03-2016 The present appeal under Section 260A of the Income-tax Act, 1961 is directed against the order passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Patna Bench, Patna (for short, ‘the Tribunal’) on 08[th] July, 2014 whereby I.T. (SS) A. No.19/Pat/2007 for the block period 1998-99 to 2004-05 up to 08.05.2003 filed by the appellant was dismissed while affirming the order of the Commissioner of Income-Tax, (Appeals)-I, Patna whereby additions of various amounts on account of undisclosed income of the assessee as individual income made by the Assessing Officer was set aside. Learned counsel for the appellant has drawn our attention to a Circular of the Government of India, Ministry of Finance, Sunil/- U Department of Revenue, Central Board Direct Taxes, New Delhi dated 10.12.2015 whereby an appeal before the High Court having tax effect of less than Rupees twenty lacs is not to be filed. Since the tax effect on account of deletion of additions would be less than Rupees twenty lacs, therefore, in view of the Circular mentioned above, this appeal cannot be maintained by the Revenue before this Court. Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed as not maintainable. (Hemant Gupta, J) (Ramesh Kumar Datta, J)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan