Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax Circle-2, Muzaffarpur v. M/S Salauddin Saran H.o.chhatradhari Bazar,Chapra(Saran
High Court
11 Apr 2012 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · patnahcucisdb94
Parties
Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax Circle-2, Muzaffarpur v. M/S Salauddin Saran H.o.chhatradhari Bazar,Chapra(Saran
Date of order
11 Apr 2012
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax Circle-2, Muzaffarpur v. M/S Salauddin Saran H.o.chhatradhari Bazar,Chapra(Saran, the High Court (2012) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: The appeal is, therefore, dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNAMiscellaneous Appeal No.148 of 2010
======================================================
1. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax Circle-2, Muzaffarpur .... .... Appellant/s Versus 1. M/S Salauddin Saran H.O.Chhatradhari Bazar,Chapra(Saran) .... .... Respondent/s
====================================================== Appearance :For the Appellant/s : Mr. Archna Sinha, advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. D. V. Pathy, advocate
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVA KIRTI SINGHand HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAINORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVA KIRTI SINGH)
3 11-04-2012 Heard the parties.
The only grievance of the revenue is that the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Patna Bench should have allowed the case of the appellant that net profit should be applied at the rate of 8% after taking into account all the expenses, instead of at the rate of 6%.
Determination of net profit for any business is on the basis of all the relevant facts and circumstances and hence, it is only an issue of fact.
In the facts of the case, no substantial question of law arises for determination by this court. The appeal is, therefore, dismissed.
(Shiva Kirti Singh, J)
BKS/-
(Vikash Jain, J)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.