Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle – 2, Patna v. M/S Bihar State Tourism Development Corporation, Patna
High Court
07 Dec 2018 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · patnahcucisdb94
Parties
Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle – 2, Patna v. M/S Bihar State Tourism Development Corporation, Patna
Date of order
07 Dec 2018
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle – 2, Patna v. M/S Bihar State Tourism Development Corporation, Patna, the High Court (2018) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: Archana Sinha, learned counsel for the appellant, on instruction received from the Department, prays forwithdrawal of the appeal, which is accordingly dismissed aswithdrawn.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
1007-12-2018
Arvind/Rajeev
U
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNAMiscellaneous Appeal No.50 of 2009
======================================================
Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle – 2, Patna.
... ... Appellant
Versus
M/S Bihar State Tourism Development corporation, Patna.
... ... Respondent
======================================================Appearance :For the Appellant/s: Mr. Archana Sinha, AdvocateFor the Respondent/s: Mr.
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JYOTI SARAN
and
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASADORAL ORDER(Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JYOTI SARAN)
Ms. Archana Sinha, learned counsel for the appellant,
on instruction received from the Department, prays forwithdrawal of the appeal, which is accordingly dismissed aswithdrawn.
(Jyoti Saran, J)
( Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue