Case LawHigh Court › Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circl...

Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle – 5(1), Kolkata v. Sarda Mines Private Limited

High Court 02 Jul 2024 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · calcutta_appellate_side
Parties
Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle – 5(1), Kolkata v. Sarda Mines Private Limited
Date of order
02 Jul 2024
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Allowed

Case summary

In Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle – 5(1), Kolkata v. Sarda Mines Private Limited, the High Court (2024) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT CALCUTTACIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTIONAPPELLATE SIDE HEARD ON: 02.07.2024 DELIVERED ON: 02.07.2024 CORAM: THE HON’BLE MR. CHIEF JUSTICE T.S. SIVAGNANAMAND THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA M.A.T. 248 of 2024WithIA No. CAN 1 of 2024 + CAN 2 of 2024 Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle – 5(1), KolkataVersusSarda Mines Private Limited Appearance:-Mr. Prithu Dudhoria ..…For the Appellant Mr. Aritra Nag …..For the Respondent JUDGMENT (Judgment of the Court was delivered by T.S. SIVAGNANAM, C.J.) In Re: IA No. CAN 1 of 2024 1.We have heard Mr. Prithu Dudhoria, learned advocate for the appellant andMr. Nag, learned advocate for the respondent.Mr. Nag, learned advocate for the respondent. 2.There is delay of 112 days in filing the appeal. We have perused the affidavitfiled in support of the petition and we find that sufficient cause has beenshown for not being able to prefer the appeal within the period of limitation.filed in support of the petition and we find that sufficient cause has beenshown for not being able to prefer the appeal within the period of limitation. 3.IA No. CAN 1 of 2024 is allowed and the delay in filing the appeal iscondoned.condoned. In Re. M.A.T. 248 of 2024 4.This intra-Court appeal is directed against an order dated 12[th] September,2023 in W.P.A. 21514 of 2023 passed by the learned Single Bench.2023 in W.P.A. 21514 of 2023 passed by the learned Single Bench. 5.The learned advocate appearing for the respondent/assessee submitted thatthe order and direction issued by the learned Single Bench has been compliedwith and the assessment order has been passed.the order and direction issued by the learned Single Bench has been compliedwith and the assessment order has been passed. 6.Hence, nothing further survives for adjudication in this appeal and the samestands disposed of accordingly.stands disposed of accordingly. 7.Accordingly, appeal and the connected application (CAN 2 of 2024) standdisposed of.disposed of. 8.No costs. 9.Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be furnished to theparties expeditiously upon compliance of all legal formalities.parties expeditiously upon compliance of all legal formalities. (T.S. SIVAGNANAM) CHIEF JUSTICE I agree. (HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan