Case Law › High Court › Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circl...

Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle- Ii, Patna v. Bihar State Financial Corporation, Frazer Road, Patna

High Court 06 Sep 2023 In favour of: Assessee

Forum / Bench

High Court · patnahcucisdb94

Parties

Date of order

06 Sep 2023

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

Case summary

In Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle- Ii, Patna v. Bihar State Financial Corporation, Frazer Road, Patna, the High Court (2023) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNAMiscellaneous Appeal No.608 of 2018 ====================================================== Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle- II, Patna ... ... Appellant/sVersus... ... Respondent/s Bihar State Financial Corporation, Frazer Road, Patna ======================================================Appearance :For the Appellant/s: Mr. Archana Sinha @ Archana Shahi, Advocate For the Respondent/s:====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHYORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) 406-09-2023The Government of India, Ministry of Financebrought out a Circular dated 08.08.2019, wherein the litigationpolicy is insofar as, not filing an appeal before the High Courtwhere the monetary stake is less than one crore rupees. Thisapplies squarely in the above case. The monetary limit of the litigation policy havingnot been exceeded, we are of the opinion that the appeal has tobe closed, but however, leaving the question of law open. (K. Vinod Chandran, CJ) Bibhash/Saurabh U ( Partha Sarthy, J)

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.