Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle-Iii, Darbhanga v. Sardar Virendra Singh
High Court
28 Feb 2013 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · patnahcucisdb94
Parties
Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle-Iii, Darbhanga v. Sardar Virendra Singh
Date of order
28 Feb 2013
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle-Iii, Darbhanga v. Sardar Virendra Singh, the High Court (2013) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNAMiscellaneous Appeal No.637 of 2008
======================================================
1.The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Muzaffarpur
2.Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle-III, Begusarai.
3.Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle-III, Darbhanga.
.... .... Appellant/s
Versus
Sardar Virendra Singh, Prop. M/s Khalsa Cloth Centre, Bara Bazar, Madhubani.
.... .... Respondent/s
====================================================== Appearance :For the Appellant/s : Mr. S.K.Sharan For the Respondent/s :
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN SINHA
and
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEYORAL ORDER
(Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN SINHA)
7 28-02-2013
Heard learned counsel for the appellants.
We find that the appellants had itself conceded the
issue before the Tribunal, as is apparent from Para 3 of the order.
We are not inclined to entertain this appeal which does not appear to be raising any substantial question of law for our consideration.
The appeal is dismissed.
(Navin Sinha, J)
Mahesh/-
(Shivaji Pandey, J)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.