Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, Jaipur v. Hari Narain Gattani
High Court
26 Jul 2016 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · jaipur
Parties
Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, Jaipur v. Hari Narain Gattani
Date of order
26 Jul 2016
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, Jaipur v. Hari Narain Gattani, the High Court (2016) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: In the light of the order passed by this Court dt.8-2-2012 thepresent appeal does not survive & accordingly stands dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
In The High Court of Judicature for RajasthanJaipur Bench, JaipurO R D E R
D.B. Income Tax Appeal No.12/1999
Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Jaipur Vs. Hari Narain Gattani
Date :: 26-7-2016
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay RastogiHon'ble Mr. Justice J.K. Ranka
Mr. Sandeep Pathak Adv., for appellant.
Mr. Prakul Khurana Adv.,]
Mr. Atul Saxena Adv.,
] for respondents.
The present appeal was admitted without framing substantial
question of law as reflected from the order dt.18-12-2000 placingreliance on D.B. Income Tax Appeal No.13/1999.
DB Income Tax Appeal No.13/1999 (Assistant Commissioner of
Income Tax (Central) Vs. Hari Narain Guttani) relating to self sameassessment year 1992-93 & the same assessee, was dismissed bythis Court vide order dt.8-2-2012 and the present appeal has beenpreferred for the same assessment year & same assessee.
In the light of the order passed by this Court dt.8-2-2012 thepresent appeal does not survive & accordingly stands dismissed.
(J.K. Ranka),J. (Ajay Rastogi),J.
VS Shekhawat Sr.P.A.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue