Case Law › High Court › Deputy Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Range...

Deputy Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Range-2, Patna v. M/S Jeevak Heart Hospital And Research Institute Pvt. Ltd

High Court 04 Sep 2023 In favour of: Assessee

Forum / Bench

High Court · patnahcucisdb94

Parties

Date of order

04 Sep 2023

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

Case summary

In Deputy Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Range-2, Patna v. M/S Jeevak Heart Hospital And Research Institute Pvt. Ltd, the High Court (2023) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: The appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

17 04-09-2023 Prakash/-avinash/- U IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNAMiscellaneous Appeal No.317 of 2008 ====================================================== 1. Commissioner of Income Tax-I, Central Revenue Building, Birchand Patel Marg, Patna. 2. Deputy Commissioner of Income-Tax, Range-2, Patna. ... ... Appellant/s Versus M/S Jeevak Heart Hospital And Research Institute Pvt. Ltd., 6, DoctorsColony, Kankerbagh, Patna-800020. ... ... Respondent/s ======================================================Appearance :For the Appellant/s: Mrs. Archana Shahi, AdvocateFor the Respondent/s: Mr. Ajay Kr. Rastogi, Advocate Ms. Shilpi Kesari, Advocate Ms. Smriti Singh, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) The learned Senior Standing Counsel for the appellants seeks permission to withdraw this appeal. 2. Permission is granted. 3. The appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. (K. Vinod Chandran, CJ) (Partha Sarthy, J)

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.