Case LawHigh Court › Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax v. She...

Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Shell Global Solutions International Bv

High Court 20 Feb 2020 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · gujarathc
Parties
Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Shell Global Solutions International Bv
Date of order
20 Feb 2020
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Shell Global Solutions International Bv, the High Court (2020) decided the matter.

Decision: 2.In the wake of such statement being made, this Tax Appeal is disposed of as not pressed on the ground of low tax effect.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

C/TAXAP/430/2017 ORDER IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABADR/TAX APPEAL NO. 430 of 2017 ========================================================== DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX Versus SHELL GLOBAL SOLUTIONS INTERNATIONAL BV ========================================================== Appearance:MR.VARUN K.PATEL(3802) for the Appellant(s) No. 1MR B S SOPARKAR(6851) for the Opponent(s) No. 1==========================================================CORAM: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE J.B.PARDIWALAandHONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BHARGAV D. KARIA Date : 20/02/2020 ORAL ORDER (PER : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE J.B.PARDIWALA) 1.Mr.Patel the learned standing counsel appearing for the Revenue makes a statement that this Tax Appeal can be disposed of on the ground of low tax effect. 2.In the wake of such statement being made, this Tax Appeal is disposed of as not pressed on the ground of low tax effect. 3.We clarify that, we have not gone into the merits of the issue raised in this Tax Appeal. (J. B. PARDIWALA, J) KUMAR ALOK (BHARGAV D. KARIA, J)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan