Case LawHigh Court › Deputy Commissioner Of Income Taxcentral...

Deputy Commissioner Of Income Taxcentral Circle 8 (3) And Ors v. Amit B. Borkar, Jj

High Court 29 Nov 2021 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Deputy Commissioner Of Income Taxcentral Circle 8 (3) And Ors v. Amit B. Borkar, Jj
Date of order
29 Nov 2021
Assessment year(s)
2012-2013
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Deputy Commissioner Of Income Taxcentral Circle 8 (3) And Ors v. Amit B. Borkar, Jj, the High Court (2021) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

Digitallysigned byGAURIGAURI AMITGAEKWADAMITDate:GAEKWAD2021.11.3011:55:28+0530 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.3396 OF 2019 Nakshatra Vimleshkumar Mehta ….Petitioner V/s. Deputy Commissioner of Income TaxCentral Circle 8 (3) and Ors. ….Respondents ---- Mr. Devendra H. Jain for petitioner.Mr. Sham V. Walve a/w. Mr. Pritish Chatterjee for respondents-Revenue. ---- CORAM : K.R. SHRIRAM & AMIT B. BORKAR, JJ. DATED : 29[th] NOVEMBER 2021 P.C. : 1This is a petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution ofIndia impugning a notice date 27[th ]March 2019 issued under Section 148 ofthe Income Tax Act, 1961 (the said Act) informing petitioner thatrespondents have reasons to believe that petitioner's income chargeable to tax for Assessment Year 2012-2013 has escaped assessment within themeaning of Section 147 of the said Act. 2 We have perused the reasons for reopening dated 7[th] June 2019 with the assistance of Mr. Jain. We do not find any error in the exercise ofjurisdiction by respondents. 3Therefore, petition dismissed. (AMIT B. BORKAR, J.) (K.R. SHRIRAM, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Defend a reassessment (Sec 148) notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan