Deputy Commissioner Of Lncome Tax, Central Circle-2, Hyderabad v. A. Siva Kartikeya
High Court
20 Jul 2021 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Deputy Commissioner Of Lncome Tax, Central Circle-2, Hyderabad v. A. Siva Kartikeya
Date of order
20 Jul 2021
Assessment year(s)
2005-06
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Deputy Commissioner Of Lncome Tax, Central Circle-2, Hyderabad v. A. Siva Kartikeya, the High Court (2021) dismissed the appeal.
Decision: Granting liberly as sought, [the ][Appeal is ][dismissed ][as ][withdrawn.]No order as to costs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE AT HYDERABAD
TUESDAY, THE TWENTIETH DAY OF JULYTWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE M.S.RAMACHANDRA RAOANDTHE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.VINOD KUMAR
INCOME TAX TRIBUNAL APPEAL NO: 532 OF 2016
lncome Tax Tribunal Appeal Under Section 260 of the lncome [Tax Act, ][against]the order of the lncome Tax Appellate Tribunal, Hyderabad Bench ['B', ][Hyderabad ][in]lTA.No.1419/HYD12011 for Assessment Year 2005-06 dated [13.05.2016 ][preferred]against the Order of the Commissioner of lncome Tax Appeals [Hyderabad, ][Appeal]No.1225, 1227,1228 & 1229109-10 dated 28.04.201 1, [preferred ]against [the ][Order of]the Deputy Commissioner of lncome Tax, Central Tax-2 [PAN/GlR No. AAGHR ][0701 ][M]daled 29.12.2009.
Between:
1. Ir/r. R.Jagadish Reddy, (died) [per ]LRs 2 to 5 Flat No.207, [Ashoka ][Ornata]Apartments, Street, No.2, Ashok Nagar, Hyderabad.Apartments, Street, No.2, Ashok Nagar, Hyderabad.
2. Smt Redreddy Vinodhi, W/o.late Sri R.Jagadish Reddy, aged about [7'1 years,]3-6-547-1, Street No.7, Opposite Minerva Hotel, Himayathnagar, Hyderabad [-]500029, Telangana3-6-547-1, Street No.7, Opposite Minerva Hotel, Himayathnagar, Hyderabad [-]500029, Telangana
3. Smt Redreddy Haritha, W/o.Sri Srinivas Haridas, aged about [48 years, ]58-21-22,Sita Ramaraju Nagar colony, Butchirajupalem, Gopalapatnam, [Visakhapatnam-]530027, Andhra Pradesh, [presently ]residing at USA.Sita Ramaraju Nagar colony, Butchirajupalem, Gopalapatnam, [Visakhapatnam-]530027, Andhra Pradesh, [presently ]residing at USA.4. Smt Smitha, W/o.Sri Trilok Pratap Singh Bhandari, aged about [45 years, ][A-812,]First Avenue, Near AFOCHS Colony, Sainikpuri, Hyderabad-500094, Telangana.First Avenue, Near AFOCHS Colony, Sainikpuri, Hyderabad-500094, Telangana.5. Smt Redreddy Swetha, W/o.Sri Pulakurthi Deepak Kumar, aged [about 43 ][years,]8-2-3101B.1121201, Anantha Residency, 12, Navodaya Colony, Road No.14,Banjara Hills, Hyderabad-500034, Telangana. Presently residing at USA.(Appellants No.2 to 5 are brought on record as per LR's of deceased AppellantNo.1 as per Court Order dated 2010712021 in lA 112021) ,ELLANT/A,'ELLANT8-2-3101B.1121201, Anantha Residency, 12, Navodaya Colony, Road No.14,Banjara Hills, Hyderabad-500034, Telangana. Presently residing at USA.(Appellants No.2 to 5 are brought on record as per LR's of deceased AppellantNo.1 as per Court Order dated 2010712021 in lA 112021) ,ELLANT/A,'ELLANT
AND
Deputy Commissioner of lncome Tax, Central Circle-2, Hyderabad.
.RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT
Counsel for the Appellant: SRI A. V. A. SIVA KARTIKEYA
Counsel for the Respondents: ---
The Court delivered the following: JUDGMENT
l
HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE [M.S. RAMACHANDTTA ]
ANI)
HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE [T. ]
I.T.T.A. No.532 of 2 l6
JT, DGMENT:(Per Sri Justice M.S.Ramachandra Roo)
The counsel for appellant [has ][ftled ][a ][letter ][dr.16.07.2021 seeking]to withdraw the Appeal [stating ][that the ][appellant ][has ][made ][an]application to the Central [Board ][of ][Direct ][Taxes under ][the Direct ][Tax]Vivad se Vishwas Act, 2020,, [and ][that Form ]- [3 had ][been issued ][by ][the]designated authority approving [the ][application ][made ][by ][the ][assessee.]
2. Having regard to the said subrnission, [the appellant ][is permitted to]withdraw the appeal with liberty to [revive ][it ][in ][the ][event there ][is ][no]satisfactory resolution of [the dispute ][between ][the parties under the ][said]Act.
3. Granting liberly as sought, [the ][Appeal is ][dismissed ][as ][withdrawn.]No order as to costs.
4, As a sequel, miscellaneous [petitions pending ][if ][any in this ][Appeal,]shall stand closed.
Sd/. K.I}RINIVASA RAOJO NT REGISTRAR
2. Having regard to the said subrnission, [the appellant ][is permitted to]withdraw the appeal with liberty to [revive ][it ][in ][the ][event there ][is ][no]satisfactory resolution of [the dispute ][between ][the parties under the ][said]Act.
3. Granting liberly as sought, [the ][Appeal is ][dismissed ][as ][withdrawn.]No order as to costs.
4, As a sequel, miscellaneous [petitions pending ][if ][any in this ][Appeal,]shall stand closed.
Sd/. K.I}RINIVASA RAOJO NT REGISTRAR
Note: Amended the cause title as [per ][the ][endorsement ][of ][the]Reqistrar Judicial-l on the [letter ][submitted ][by ][the ][counsel ][for ][the]appellant, dated 14togl2o21. [This ][substitutes ][the ][earlier CT ][which]was dispatched on 0310812021.
sd/-K.sRtNlvASA RAoJOINT REGISTRAR5,<SECTION OFFICER
//TRUE COPY/|
To,
1. The lncome Tax Appellate [Tribunal, Hyderabad Bench ]['B', ][Hyderabad']
2. One CC to Sri A. V. [A. Siva Kartikeya Advocate ]
3. Two CD Copies
I
v
HIGH COURT
DATED: 2010712021
DATED: 2010912021
AMENDED JUDGMENT
ITTA.No.532 of 2016
DISMISSING THE ITTAAS WITHDRAWN
+sx
\r.
1' [(.4]:.\ivsx-oc..,$"UJI.$"At., t )4 [\'.:.,]
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.