Case LawHigh Court › Deputycommissioner Of Income Tax v. Shri...

Deputycommissioner Of Income Tax v. Shri Veenu Jain

High Court 11 Mar 2016 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · cghccisdb
Parties
Deputycommissioner Of Income Tax v. Shri Veenu Jain
Date of order
11 Mar 2016
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Deputycommissioner Of Income Tax v. Shri Veenu Jain, the High Court (2016) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: 2.Accordingly, the Appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

inder NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR Tax Case (Income Tax Appeal) No. 16 of 2016 DeputyCommissioner of Income Tax, 1, Bhilai, District Durg (CG). ---- Appellant Versus Shri Veenu Jain R/o 63, Nehru Nagar (Old) Bhilai, District Durg (CG). ---- Respondent For Appellant: Ms. Naushina Ali, Advocate. Hon'ble Shri Justice Manindra Mohan ShrivastavaHon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy ORDER ON BOARD Per, Manindra Mohan Shrivastava, J. 11/03/2016. 1.In view of circular dated 10.12.2015 issued by the Ministry of Finance, Department of Revenue, Central Board Direct Taxes, learned counsel appearing for the Appellant seeks to withdraw this appeal. Finance, Department of Revenue, Central Board Direct Taxes, learned counsel appearing for the Appellant seeks to withdraw this appeal. 2.Accordingly, the Appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- Sd/- (Manindra Mohan Shrivastava) (P. Sam Koshy) JUDGE JUDGE
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan