Desai And Company v. Commissioner Of Income Tax
High Court
23 Feb 2004 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · gujarathc
Parties
Desai And Company v. Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
23 Feb 2004
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
Case summary
In Desai And Company v. Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2004) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Issue: Whether it is to be circulated to the concerned : NO Magistrate/Magistrates,Judge/Judges,Tribunal/Tribunals? -------------------------------------------------------------- DESAI AND COMPANY Versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: 1...
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
INCOME TAX REFERENCE No 329 of 1993
For Approval and Signature:
HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.S.SHAH
and
HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.C.PATEL
============================================================
1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO
to see the judgements?
2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO
3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO
of the judgement?
4. Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder?
5. Whether it is to be circulated to the concerned : NO Magistrate/Magistrates,Judge/Judges,Tribunal/Tribunals?
--------------------------------------------------------------
DESAI AND COMPANY
Versus
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
-------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance:
1. INCOME TAX REFERENCE No. 329 of 1993 NOTICE SERVED for Petitioner No. 1 MR MANISH R BHATT for Respondent No. 1
--------------------------------------------------------------
CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.S.SHAH
and
HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.C.PATEL
Date of decision: 23/02/2004
ORAL JUDGEMENT
(Per : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.S.SHAH)
�Mr RK Patel, learned counsel appears for the
applicant-assessee. Mr Manish R Bhatt, learned standing counsel appears for the revenue.
2.�At the hearing of this reference, Mr RK Patel, learned counsel for the applicant-assessee states, under instructions, that the applicant-assessee is not desirous of pressing this reference. 3.�In view of the above, we decline to answer the question referred for our opinion. �The reference accordingly stands disposed of.
�����(M.S. SHAH, J.)�����(M.C. PATEL, J.) zgs/-
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.