Devang K. Chokshi, Mumbai v. The Dy. Commissioner Of Income Tax - 12(2), Mumbai
High Court
07 Mar 2011 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Devang K. Chokshi, Mumbai v. The Dy. Commissioner Of Income Tax - 12(2), Mumbai
Date of order
07 Mar 2011
Assessment year(s)
2002-2003
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Devang K. Chokshi, Mumbai v. The Dy. Commissioner Of Income Tax - 12(2), Mumbai, the High Court (2011) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: The appeal is accordingly dismissed with no order as to costs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.90 OF 2011
Devang K. Chokshi, Mumbai
Versus
The Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax - 12(2), Mumbai
..Appellant.
..Respondent.
Mr.Rahul Hakani for the appellant.Mr.A.S. Shivsaran for the respondent.
CORAM : J.P. Devadhar & Smt.R.S. Dalvi, JJ.
P.C. :
DATE : 7[th] March, 2011.
1.By consent the appeal is taken up for admission.
2.This appeal is filed by the appellant against the order of the
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal dated 27-8-2010 in Income Tax Appeal No.231/M/2010 relating to assessment year 2002-2003. Perusal of the order of the Tribunal shows that the Tribunal has restored the issued raised in this appeal to the file of the assessing officer for reconsideration in the light of the judgment of this Court in the case of Commissioner of Income Tax V/s. Kalpataru Colours & Chemicals reported in 328 ITR 457.
3.Since the matter is restored to the file of the assessing officer for
reconsideration in the light of the judgment of this Court in the case of Kalpataru Colours & Chemicals (Supra), we are not inclined to entertain this appeal. The appeal is accordingly dismissed with no order as to costs.
(Smt.R.S. Dalvi, J.)
(J.P. Devadhar, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue