Devarajan N.t.kozhikode - 673 303.By Advs.harisankar v. Menonmeera V.menon
High Court
13 May 2022 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Devarajan N.t.kozhikode - 673 303.By Advs.harisankar v. Menonmeera V.menon
Date of order
13 May 2022
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Devarajan N.t.kozhikode - 673 303.By Advs.harisankar v. Menonmeera V.menon, the High Court (2022) decided the matter.
Decision: In view of the limited prayer madein the writ petition, the writ petition is disposed of directing therespondents to hear and dispose of Ext.P2 appeal at the earliest.There will be a further direction to the respondents to take upExt.P3 stay petition and hear and dispose of the same within threemont...
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAVI
FRIDAY, THE 13 DAY OF MAY 2022 / 23RD VAISAKHA, 1944
WP(C) NO. 15819 OF 2022
PETITIONER:
DEVARAJAN N.T.KOZHIKODE - 673 303.BY ADVS.HARISANKAR V. MENONMEERA V.MENON
5/500 2/318, RARICHAMVELI,
CHETTIKULAM, ELATHUR P.O.,
RESPONDENTS:
1THE ADDITIONAL/JOINT/DEPUTY/ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX/INCOME TAX OFFICERNATIONAL FACELESS ASSESSMENT CENTRE, DELHI- 110 001.2NATIONAL FACELESS APPEAL CENTREDELHI - 110 001, REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS).
DELHI - 110 001, REPRESENTED BY THE
SRI.CHRISTOPHOR ABRAHAM (SC) SRI.SAYYED MURTHALA THANGAL, GOVERNMENT PLEADER
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON13.05.2022, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
T.R. RAVI, J.
----------------------------------------
W.P.(C). No. 15819 of 2022
-------------------------------------------Dated this the 13[th] day of May, 2022
JUDGMENT
Admit. Standing Counsel takes notice for respondents.The limited prayer in the writ petition is for a disposal of Ext.P2appeal and Ext.P3 stay petition. In view of the limited prayer madein the writ petition, the writ petition is disposed of directing therespondents to hear and dispose of Ext.P2 appeal at the earliest.There will be a further direction to the respondents to take upExt.P3 stay petition and hear and dispose of the same within threemonths. Coercive steps for recovery shall remain stayed till thedisposal of the stay petition.
Sd/-
T.R.RAVIJUDGE
APPENDIX OF WP(C) 15819/2022
PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS
Exhibit P1COPY OF ORDER ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENTFOR THE YEAR 2016-17 DATED 26.03.2022.Exhibit P2COPY OF APPEAL FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT 22.04.2022.Exhibit P3COPY OF STAY PETITION FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT DATED24.04.2022.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.