Case LawHigh Court › Devendra Prasad v. The State Of Bihar

Devendra Prasad v. The State Of Bihar

High Court 07 May 2014 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · patnahcucisdb94
Parties
Devendra Prasad v. The State Of Bihar
Date of order
07 May 2014
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In Devendra Prasad v. The State Of Bihar, the High Court (2014) decided the matter.

Decision: 3.With the leave aforesaid, the contempt petition is disposed of.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNAMiscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.3330 of 2013 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 3724 of 2007 ====================================================== Devendra Prasad, S/O Late Bikneshwar Prasad, R/O Mohalla- East of Sector-8, Behind Income Tax Colony, Bahadurpur Housing Colony, P.S- Agamkuan, District- Patna. .... .... Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Bihar 2. Shree Navin Kumar, the Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar, Patna. 3. Shree Sudhir Kumar, the Commissioner- Cum- Secretary, Animal Husbandry Department Dairy Development, Bihar, Patna. 4. Shree Anil Kumar Singh, the Director (Dairy) Development Directorate, Bihar, Patna. .... .... Opposite Parties/Contemnors. ====================================================== ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.N. SINHA ORAL ORDER 5 07-05-2014 Counsel for the State has produced the banker’s cheque drawn in the name of the petitioner for Rs. 1,95,066/- (one lakh ninety-five thousand sixty six only) in the light of the order of the High Court and the notification of the Government dated 11,13.3.2014 and with reference to the said cheque states that the order of the High Court under contempt has been complied with. 2. Aforesaid submission is accepted by the counsel for the petitioner but he seeks leave to examine the calculation and if any further amount is due, to take appropriate steps in accordance with law. 3.With the leave aforesaid, the contempt petition is disposed of. 4. Let counsel for the petitioner grant receipt in the margin of the order-sheet that he has received banker’s cheque dated 30.04.2014 for Rs. 1,95,066/-. (V.N. Sinha, J) P.K.P.
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan