In Dharmasinh M Popat v. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax 11(2, the High Court (2010) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: Accordingly the present Appeal is dismissed as infructuous with no order as to costs. [R.M.SAVANT, J] [J P DEVADHAR, J]
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
lgc
1 ITXA NO.1444/09.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1444 OF 2009
Dharmasinh M PopatVersusThe Assistant Commissioner of IncomeTax 11(2)
: Appellant.
: Respondent.
Mr. N Thakkar i/by Mulla & Mulla for the Appellant.Mr. P S Sahadevan for the Respondent.
CORAM :J P DEVADHAR AND R M SAVANT, JJ.DATED :16[th] NOVEMBER 2010
P.C.
Heard the learned counsel for the parties.
Perused the Appeal.
2The learned counsel for both the sides state that the order impugned in this Appeal has been recalled to the extent contained in the order dated 05/02/2010 in Misc. Application No. 633/Mum/09 .
3In the light of the aforesaid order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal,
the learned counsel for the Appellant states that this Appeal has become infructuous . Accordingly the present Appeal is dismissed as infructuous with no order as to costs.
[R.M.SAVANT, J]
[J P DEVADHAR, J]
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue