Dia Gold Jewels Private Ltd v. The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax & Ors
High Court
14 Jan 2025 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · calcutta_appellate_side
Parties
Dia Gold Jewels Private Ltd v. The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax & Ors
Date of order
14 Jan 2025
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
Case summary
In Dia Gold Jewels Private Ltd v. The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax & Ors, the High Court (2025) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
14.01.2025
Item No.22
PG/KS
Ct. No.1
M.A.T. 1179 of 2023
In
IA No. CAN 3 of 2024
Dia Gold Jewels Private Ltd. Vs.
The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax & Ors.
Mr. Ranjit Kumar Murarka, Sr. Adv. Mr. Dibanath Dey
….. For the Appellant
Mr. Aryak Dutt, Sr. Standing Counsel
Ms. Riya Kundu
…..For the Respondent
1. We have heard Mr. Murarka, learned senior advocateappearing for the appellant and Mr. Aryak Dutt, learnedsenior standing counsel for the department. appearing for the appellant and Mr. Aryak Dutt, learnedsenior standing counsel for the department.
2. This application has been filed to condone the delay infiling the application to recall/amend the order dated18[th] August, 2023 in relation to CAN 2 of 2023. filing the application to recall/amend the order dated18[th] August, 2023 in relation to CAN 2 of 2023.
3. By a common order, the appeal in M.A.T. No.1179 of2023 along with IA No. CAN 1 of 2023 and CAN 2 of2023 were dismissed. However, it appears that theprayer in CAN 2 of 2023 was not rightly pointed out asthe said application was for addition of parties and theCourt was of the opinion that it is a prayer for stay.2023 along with IA No. CAN 1 of 2023 and CAN 2 of2023 were dismissed. However, it appears that theprayer in CAN 2 of 2023 was not rightly pointed out asthe said application was for addition of parties and theCourt was of the opinion that it is a prayer for stay.
4. Therefore, this application (IA No. CAN 3 of 2024) isallowed and the delay in filing the application iscondoned and the order in IA No.CAN 2 of 2023 datedallowed and the delay in filing the application iscondoned and the order in IA No.CAN 2 of 2023 dated
18[th] August, 2023 dismissing the said application filedfor addition of parties is recalled and liberty is grantedto the applicant/writ petitioner to pursue the separateapplication filed by it in the writ petition.
5. No costs.
6. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if appliedfor, be furnished to the parties expeditiously uponcompliance of all legal formalities.for, be furnished to the parties expeditiously uponcompliance of all legal formalities.
(T.S SIVAGNANAM)
CHIEF JUSTICE
(HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.