Digitally Signed Minal By Minal V.parab v. Itxa-2076-19.Doc_

(16)-ITXA-2076-19.doc. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.2076 OF 2019 Ketan Pravinchandra Kamdar ..AppellantVersus Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax,Central Circle-7(3), Muumbai..Respondent Mr. Atul K. Jasani, Advocate for the Appellant. Mr. Sham Walve h/f Mr. N. C. Mohanty, Advocate for the Respondent. CORAM : UJJAL BHUYAN & MILIND N. JADHAV, JJ. DATE : 2[nd] MARCH, 2021 P.C. Heard Mr. Atul K. Jasani, learned counsel for the appellantand Mr. Sham Walve, learned counsel for the respondent. 2. This appeal has been preferred by the assessee as the appellantunder section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 against the order dated21.08.2018 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “H” Bench,Mumbai in ITA No.136/Mum/2016 for the assessment year 2008-09. 3. The appeal is pending for admission. 4. Today the appeal is before us on a praecipe filed by learnedcounsel for the appellant. 5. It is stated that Parliament has enacted the Direct Tax Vivad se 1 of 2 (16)-ITXA-2076-19.doc. Vishwas Act, 2020 providing for a scheme for resolution of tax disputes. Interms thereof, appellant has filed declaration under section 3 on20.01.2021 before the designated authority. Designated authority hasissued certificate under section 5(1) on 23.02.2021 determining theamount payable. For passing of the final order under section 5(2),appellant is required to withdraw the appeal under section 4(3) and tofurnish proof of withdrawal along with intimation of payment, if any, to thedesignated authority. Hence, prayer for withdrawal of the appeal. 6. Learned counsel for the respondent has no objection to theprayer made. 7. Having regard to the above, we allow withdrawal of the appeal. 8. Appeal is accordingly disposed of as withdrawn. 9. Refund as per rules. MILIND N. JADHAV, J UJJAL BHUYAN, J 2 of 2