Case LawHigh Court › Digitally Signedby Vishakhabeohardate:20...

Digitally Signedby Vishakhabeohardate:2024.08.2910:24:48 +0530 v. M/S. R. R. Energy Ltd. N.h

High Court 28 Aug 2024 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · cghccisdb
Parties
Digitally Signedby Vishakhabeohardate:2024.08.2910:24:48 +0530 v. M/S. R. R. Energy Ltd. N.h
Date of order
28 Aug 2024
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Digitally Signedby Vishakhabeohardate:2024.08.2910:24:48 +0530 v. M/S. R. R. Energy Ltd. N.h, the High Court (2024) decided the matter under Section 5 of the Income-tax Act.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

VISHAKHABEOHAR NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR TAXC No. 42 of 2019 1 - Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax Central Circle, Raipur, District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh ----Appellant Digitally signedby VISHAKHABEOHARDate:2024.08.2910:24:48 +0530 Versus 1 - M/s. R. R. Energy Ltd. N.H. No. 22, Village Garhumariya, Jharsuguda Road, Raigarh, Chhattisgarh., District : Raigarh, Chhattisgarh ---- Respondent TAXC No. 45 of 2019 1 - Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax Central Circle, Raipur, District - Raipur Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh ----Appellant Versus 1 - M/s. R. R. Energy Ltd. N. H. No. 22, Village Garhumariya, Jharsuguda Road, Raigarh Chhattisgarh., District : Raigarh, Chhattisgarh ---- Respondent TAXC No. 57 of 2019 1 - Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax Central Circle Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh ----Appellant Versus 1 - R K Transport And Constructions Pvt. Ltd. Beside Ceat Tyre, Transport Nagar, Korba Chhattisgarh., District : Korba, Chhattisgarh ---- Respondent TAXC No. 58 of 2019 1 - Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax Central Circle Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh ----Appellant Versus 1 - R K Transport And Constructions Pvt. Ltd Beside Ceat Tyre, Transport Nagar, Korba Chhattisgarh., District : Korba, Chhattisgarh ---- Respondent TAXC No. 77 of 2019 1 - Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax Central Circle, Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh ----Appellant Versus 1 - R K Transport And Constructions Pvt. Ltd. Beside Ceat Tyre, Transport Nagar, Korba Chhattisgarh, District : Korba, Chhattisgarh ---- Respondent TAXC No. 78 of 2019 1 - Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax Central Circle, Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh ----Appellant Versus 1 - R K Transport And Constructions Pvt. Ltd. Beside Ceat Tyre, Transport Nagar, Korba Chhattisgarh, District : Korba, Chhattisgarh ---- Respondent (Cause-title taken from the Case Information System) --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- For Appellant(s):- Mr. Amit Choudhari & Mr. Topilal Bareth, AdvocatesFor Respondent(s) :- Mr. Kshitij Sharma, Advocate --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 'Division Bench- Honble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal andHon’ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad Order On Board 28.08.2024 1. Heard. 2. The appellants have preferred these tax appeals against the order dated 18.01.2018 (Annexure A-1) passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Raipur (for Short ’ITAT’).18.01.2018 (Annexure A-1) passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Raipur (for Short ’ITAT’). 3. It is stated at the Bar by learned counsel for the assessee/respondent that on taking full and final settlement amount of tax arrear under Section 5(2) read with Section 6 of the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020 all taxes have been paid on 08.02.2021 and 01.03.2021.on taking full and final settlement amount of tax arrear under Section 5(2) read with Section 6 of the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020 all taxes have been paid on 08.02.2021 and 01.03.2021. 4. The said fact has not been disputed by learned counsel for the appellant. 5. In that view of the matter, these tax cases are accordingly disposed off, as no cause of action survives for consideration.no cause of action survives for consideration. Sd/- Sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) JudgeJudge
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan