Digitally Signedby Vishakhabeohardate:2024.08.2910:24:48 +0530 v. M/S. R. R. Energy Ltd. N.h
High Court
28 Aug 2024 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · cghccisdb
Parties
Digitally Signedby Vishakhabeohardate:2024.08.2910:24:48 +0530 v. M/S. R. R. Energy Ltd. N.h
Date of order
28 Aug 2024
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Digitally Signedby Vishakhabeohardate:2024.08.2910:24:48 +0530 v. M/S. R. R. Energy Ltd. N.h, the High Court (2024) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
VISHAKHABEOHAR
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
TAXC No. 42 of 2019
1 - Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax Central Circle, Raipur, District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh ----Appellant
Digitally signedby VISHAKHABEOHARDate:2024.08.2910:24:48 +0530
Versus
1 - M/s. R. R. Energy Ltd. N.H. No. 22, Village Garhumariya, Jharsuguda Road, Raigarh, Chhattisgarh., District : Raigarh, Chhattisgarh ---- Respondent
TAXC No. 45 of 2019
1 - Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax Central Circle, Raipur, District - Raipur Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh ----Appellant
Versus
1 - M/s. R. R. Energy Ltd. N. H. No. 22, Village Garhumariya, Jharsuguda Road, Raigarh Chhattisgarh., District : Raigarh, Chhattisgarh ---- Respondent
TAXC No. 57 of 2019
1 - Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax Central Circle Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh ----Appellant
Versus
1 - R K Transport And Constructions Pvt. Ltd. Beside Ceat Tyre, Transport Nagar, Korba Chhattisgarh., District : Korba, Chhattisgarh ---- Respondent
TAXC No. 58 of 2019
1 - Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax Central Circle Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh ----Appellant
Versus
1 - R K Transport And Constructions Pvt. Ltd Beside Ceat Tyre, Transport Nagar, Korba Chhattisgarh., District : Korba, Chhattisgarh ---- Respondent
TAXC No. 77 of 2019
1 - Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax Central Circle, Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh ----Appellant
Versus
1 - R K Transport And Constructions Pvt. Ltd. Beside Ceat Tyre, Transport Nagar, Korba Chhattisgarh, District : Korba, Chhattisgarh ---- Respondent
TAXC No. 78 of 2019
1 - Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax Central Circle, Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh ----Appellant
Versus
1 - R K Transport And Constructions Pvt. Ltd. Beside Ceat Tyre, Transport Nagar, Korba Chhattisgarh, District : Korba, Chhattisgarh ---- Respondent
(Cause-title taken from the Case Information System)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
For Appellant(s):- Mr. Amit Choudhari & Mr. Topilal Bareth, AdvocatesFor Respondent(s) :- Mr. Kshitij Sharma, Advocate
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
'Division Bench- Honble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal andHon’ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad
Order On Board
28.08.2024
1. Heard.
2. The appellants have preferred these tax appeals against the order dated 18.01.2018 (Annexure A-1) passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Raipur (for Short ’ITAT’).18.01.2018 (Annexure A-1) passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Raipur (for Short ’ITAT’).
3. It is stated at the Bar by learned counsel for the assessee/respondent that on taking full and final settlement amount of tax arrear under Section 5(2) read with Section 6 of the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020 all taxes have been paid on 08.02.2021 and 01.03.2021.on taking full and final settlement amount of tax arrear under Section 5(2) read with Section 6 of the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020 all taxes have been paid on 08.02.2021 and 01.03.2021.
4. The said fact has not been disputed by learned counsel for the appellant.
5. In that view of the matter, these tax cases are accordingly disposed off, as no cause of action survives for consideration.no cause of action survives for consideration.
Sd/-
Sd/-
(Sanjay K. Agrawal)
(Amitendra Kishore Prasad)
JudgeJudge
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.