Digitallyminalsigned Byminal v. Parabv.date:2021.01.12Parab12:40:48+0530
High Court
11 Jan 2021 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Digitallyminalsigned Byminal v. Parabv.date:2021.01.12Parab12:40:48+0530
Date of order
11 Jan 2021
Assessment year(s)
2006-2007
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Digitallyminalsigned Byminal v. Parabv.date:2021.01.12Parab12:40:48+0530, the High Court (2021) decided the matter.
Decision: 8.Appeal is accordingly disposed of on withdrawal.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONINCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1012 OF 2012
M/s. Mipco Seamless Rings (Guj.) Limited…AppellantVs.Commissioner of Income Tax-6…Respondent
Ms. Rutuja Pawar a/w. Ms. Hetal Laghave for Appellant.Mr. Arvind Pinto for Respondent.
CORAM : UJJAL BHUYAN &MILIND N. JADHAV, JJ.DATE :JANUARY 11, 2021
P.C.:
Heard Ms. Rutuja Pawar, learned counsel for the appellant andMr. Arvind Pinto, learned standing counsel Revenue for the respondent.
2.This appeal under section 260-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 hasbeen preferred by the assessee against the order dated 01.02.2017 passedby the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, 'B' Bench, Mumbai in I.T.A.No.2680/Mumbai/2010 for the assessment year 2006-2007.
3.The appeal was admitted by this Court on 10.03.2014 on thesubstantial questions of law framed in the said order.
4.Today the appeal is before us on praecipe filed by learned counselfor the appellant.
5.Ms. Pawar submits that Parliament has enacted the Direct TaxVivad se Vishwas Act, 2020 (briefly ‘the Act’ hereinafter) providing for ascheme for settlement of tax disputes. In terms of the said scheme,appellant had filed declaration under section 3 thereof before theDesignated authority. Designated Authority had issued a certificateunder section 5(1) of the said Act. However, before passing of the final
order under section 5(2) of the said Act, appellant is required towithdraw the appeal under section 4(3) thereof. Hence, the prayer forwithdrawal of the appeal.
6.Learned counsel for the respondent has no objection to the prayermade for withdrawal of the appeal.
7.Considering the above, we allow the appellant to withdraw theappeal.appeal.
8.Appeal is accordingly disposed of on withdrawal.
9.Refund as per Rules.
10.This order will be digitally signed by the Private Secretary of thisCourt. All concerned will act on production by fax or email of a digitallysigned copy of this order.
(MILIND N. JADHAV, J.)
(UJJAL BHUYAN, J.)
Minal Parab
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.