Dileep Singh Shekhawat (2014-15) v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central Circle-4, Roomno. 416, 4[Th] Floor, Jeevan Nidhi-2, Lic Building, Ambedkar Circle,Jaipur, Rajasthan - Rajasthan
High Court
26 Sep 2025 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · jaipur
Parties
Dileep Singh Shekhawat (2014-15) v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central Circle-4, Roomno. 416, 4[Th] Floor, Jeevan Nidhi-2, Lic Building, Ambedkar Circle,Jaipur, Rajasthan - Rajasthan
Date of order
26 Sep 2025
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Dileep Singh Shekhawat (2014-15) v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central Circle-4, Roomno. 416, 4[Th] Floor, Jeevan Nidhi-2, Lic Building, Ambedkar Circle,Jaipur, Rajasthan - Rajasthan, the High Court (2025) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 6534/2025
Dileep Singh Shekhawat (2014-15), S/o Late Shri Rawat SinghShekhawat, Aged About 65 Years, R/o D-34, Hanuman Nagar,Vaishali Nagar, Jaipur-302021, Rajasthan, India.
----Petitioner
Versus
Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central Circle-4, RoomNo. 416, 4[th] Floor, Jeevan Nidhi-2, Lic Building, Ambedkar Circle,Jaipur, Rajasthan - Rajasthan 302005
----Respondent
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEET PUROHITJudgment / Order
26/09/2025
Learned counsels for the respective parties submit that thecontroversy involved herein is no more res integra and standsresolved by a coordinate Bench order of this Court dated16.09.2025 passed in the case of Shri Ravi Agarwal versus
Income-Tax Officer & Ors.: DB Civil Writ PetitionNo.11981/2025. They, therefore, pray that this writ petition mayalso be disposed of in similar terms.
Ordered accordingly.
Pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of.
(SANJEET PUROHIT),J(MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL),J
Manish/9
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue