In Dilipkumar v. Lakhi, the High Court (2019) allowed the appeal.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Priya Soparkar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.212 OF 2019
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.3773 OF 2018
Dilipkumar V. Lakhi
V/s.
Asst. Commissioner of Income-Tax
… Applicant/ Appellant
… Respondent
---
Mr.Subhash Shetty i/by Mr.Sameer Dalal for theApplicant/Appellant.
---
CORAM : AKIL KURESHI AND M.S.SANKLECHA, JJ.
DATE : MARCH 7, 2019.
P.C.:-
1.None appears for the respondent despite service.
2.Mr.Subhash Shetty, learned counsel appearing in support ofnotice of motion undertakes to file affidavit of service within oneweek from today. This motion is to condone 85 days delay infiling the appeal from the order dated 19[th] April, 2018 of theIncome Tax Appellate Tribunal.
Priya Soparkar
258 nma 212-19 in itxal 3773-18-o
with the reasons indicated therein for the delay. Accordingly,
delay in filing the appeal is condoned.
4.Notice of motion is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a).No order as to costs.
(M.S.SANKLECHA,J.) (AKIL KURESHI,J.)….
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.