Dinesh Kumar Goyal v. Income Tax Officer, Ward-6(1), Kolkata & Anr

OD-3 WPO 966 of 2023IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTACONSTITUTIONAL WRIT JURISDICTIONORIGINAL SIDE DINESH KUMAR GOYALVS. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-6(1), KOLKATA & ANR. BEFORE: The Hon’ble JUSTICE MD. NIZAMUDDINDate: 4[th] May, 2023. Mr. R. N. Dutt, Ms. Sutapa Roy Choudhury, Mr. Abhijat Das, Ms.Aratrika Roy, Mr. Anirban Chatterjee, Advocates for the petitioner. Mr. S. Roy Chowdhury, Advocate for respondents. The Court : Heard learned Advocates for the parties. A limited grievance raised by the petitioner in this writ petition isrelating to non-consideration and sitting over his repeated representationsfor updation of challans against the outstanding taxes in question relatingto assessment years 2005-2006, 2006-2007, 2009-2010 and 2013-2014. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and submissionsof the parties, the respondent Income Tax Officer, Ward-6(1), Kolkata isdirected to consider and dispose of the pending representations in questionin accordance with law for updation of the challans in question within aperiod of four weeks from date and to intimate such action to the petitionerwithin a week from the date of taking such action. With this observation and direction, this writ petition being WPO 966 of 2023 stands disposed of. (MD. NIZAMUDDIN, J.) pa