Case Law › High Court › Dinesh Kumar Kedia v. Assistant/Deputy C...

Dinesh Kumar Kedia v. Assistant/Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle

High Court 29 Mar 2022 In favour of: Revenue

Forum / Bench

High Court · jaipur

Parties

Date of order

29 Mar 2022

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

Case summary

In Dinesh Kumar Kedia v. Assistant/Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle, the High Court (2022) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: Writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D. B. Civil Writ Petition No. 5031/2022 Dinesh Kumar Kedia S/o Shri Krishna Gopal Kedia, Aged About63 years, R/o 191, Shiv Marg, Surya Nagar, Gopalpura Bypass,Jaipur 302015. ----Petitioner Versus 1. Assistant/Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle 6,Jaipur, New Central Revenue Building, Bhagwan DasRoad, Jaipur Rajasthan 302005Jaipur, New Central Revenue Building, Bhagwan DasRoad, Jaipur Rajasthan 302005 Respondent No. 1 2. National Faceless Assessment Centre, Government ofIndia, Ministry of Finance Department of Revenue, NorthBlock, New Delhi- 110001.India, Ministry of Finance Department of Revenue, NorthBlock, New Delhi- 110001. ----Respondent No. 2 For Petitioner : Mr. Tanuj Agrawal Advocate. For Respondents: Mr. Nikhil Simlote Advocate. HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE MR. MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN Order 29/03/2022 Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks to withdraw the petition. Writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. (SAMEER JAIN),J(MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA),ACTING CJ MANOJ NARWANI /132

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.