Case LawHigh Court › Dinesh Mittal Son Of Shri Sumer Chand Ja...

Dinesh Mittal Son Of Shri Sumer Chand Jain v. Income Tax Officer, Ward 1 (1), Jaipur

High Court 20 Feb 2024 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · jaipur
Parties
Dinesh Mittal Son Of Shri Sumer Chand Jain v. Income Tax Officer, Ward 1 (1), Jaipur
Date of order
20 Feb 2024
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Dinesh Mittal Son Of Shri Sumer Chand Jain v. Income Tax Officer, Ward 1 (1), Jaipur, the High Court (2024) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: The writ petition is dismissed as not pressed with liberty asprayed for.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

The order — as passed by the High Court

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 10400/2023 Dinesh Mittal Son Of Shri Sumer Chand Jain, Aged About 68Years, Resident Of 176, Gheewalon Ka Rasta, Johari Bazar, Jaipur- 302003 ----Petitioner Versus Income Tax Officer, Ward 1 (1), Jaipur Having Its Address AtNew Central Revenue Building, Bhagwan Das Road, Jaipur302005 ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) For Respondent(s) : Mr. Siddharth Ranka with Ms. Shivangi MewalMs. Shivangi Mewal: Mr. Anuroop Singhi with Mr. N.S. BhatiMr. Aditya KhandelwalMr. N.S. BhatiMr. Aditya Khandelwal HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGAN HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SHUBHA MEHTA Order 20/02/2024 Learned counsel for the petitioner after arguing for sometime is not pressing the writ petition with liberty to raise all thepleas raised in this petition including the plea germaning fromSection 151A and the scheme framed thereunder in theproceedings under Section 147/148 of the Income Tax Act atappropriate stage. The writ petition is dismissed as not pressed with liberty asprayed for. (SHUBHA MEHTA),J (AVNEESH JHINGAN),J Simple Kumawat /23
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Defend a reassessment (Sec 148) notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan