Case LawHigh Court › Dipak Samanta v. Income Tax Officer, War...

Dipak Samanta v. Income Tax Officer, Ward 47(2) & Ors

High Court 11 Jun 2025 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · calcutta_appellate_side
Parties
Dipak Samanta v. Income Tax Officer, Ward 47(2) & Ors
Date of order
11 Jun 2025
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Dipak Samanta v. Income Tax Officer, Ward 47(2) & Ors, the High Court (2025) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
20.06.2025sayandeep Sl. No. 08 Ct. No. 05 WPA 1633 of 2025 Dipak Samanta Vs. Income Tax Officer, Ward 47(2) & ors. Mr. Abhijat Das Ms. Aratrika Roy Mr. Anirban Chatterjee …. for the petitioner Mr. Soumen Bhattacharjee Mr. Ankan Das Mr. Ankan Das Ms. Shradhya Ghosh ….for the Income Tax Authority 1.This matter has come up at the instance of the petitioner for seeking corrections of certain typographical errors in the order dated 11[th] June, 2025. petitioner for seeking corrections of certain typographical errors in the order dated 11[th] June, 2025. 2.It appears that in the order dated 11[th] June, 2025 in the appearance of the parties, the name of Mr. Abhijat Das and Ms. Aratrika Roy has been wrongly transcribed. Let the same be corrected. the appearance of the parties, the name of Mr. Abhijat Das and Ms. Aratrika Roy has been wrongly transcribed. Let the same be corrected. 3.In so far as the appearance of the respondents are concerned, it has been recorded that they appear for the CGST authority. Let the same be corrected as Income Tax Authority. concerned, it has been recorded that they appear for the CGST authority. Let the same be corrected as Income Tax Authority. 4.Similarly, the 2[nd] line of paragraph No. 5 at page-2, the word “CGST” be substituted with the words “Income Tax”. the word “CGST” be substituted with the words “Income Tax”. 5.The department is directed to carry out the aforesaid corrections. Other portions of the aforesaid order shall remain unaltered. corrections. Other portions of the aforesaid order shall remain unaltered. (Raja Basu Chowdhury, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan