Case LawHigh Court › Dipikaben Kaniyalal Prajapati v. Income...

Dipikaben Kaniyalal Prajapati v. Income Tax Officer

High Court 21 Feb 2022 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · gujarathc
Parties
Dipikaben Kaniyalal Prajapati v. Income Tax Officer
Date of order
21 Feb 2022
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In Dipikaben Kaniyalal Prajapati v. Income Tax Officer, the High Court (2022) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABADR/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 3464 of 2022 ========================================================== DIPIKABEN KANIYALAL PRAJAPATI VersusINCOME TAX OFFICER ========================================================== Appearance:MR PANKAJ K SONI(1940) for the Petitioner(s) No. 1 for the Respondent(s) No. 1 ========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE J.B.PARDIWALAand HONOURABLE MS. JUSTICE NISHA M. THAKORE Date : 21/02/2022 ORAL ORDER (PER : HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE J.B.PARDIWALA) We have heard Mr. P.K. Soni, the learned counsel appearingfor the writ applicant. We permit Mr. Soni to withdraw this writapplication with a liberty to file an appropriate writ application inaccordance with law. We are saying so because the entire writ application proceeds on the erroneous footing that a notice under Section 148of the Act could not have been issued since the case is one ofsearch and the writ applicant is a “other person”. All the groundsraised in this writ application relate to Section 153C. If the writapplicant has any case with respect to “reason to believe” asenvisaged under Section 148 of the Act, it shall be open for thewrit applicant to file a fresh writ application. In view of the aforesaid, this writ application stands disposedof as withdrawn. (J. B. PARDIWALA, J) (NISHA M. THAKORE,J)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Defend a reassessment (Sec 148) notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan