Case LawHigh Court › Director Income Tax (International Taxat...

Director Income Tax (International Taxation), Delhi-Ii, New Delhi v. J. Ray Mcdermott Middle East Inc

High Court 31 Mar 2014 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · ukhcucis_pg
Parties
Director Income Tax (International Taxation), Delhi-Ii, New Delhi v. J. Ray Mcdermott Middle East Inc
Date of order
31 Mar 2014
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In Director Income Tax (International Taxation), Delhi-Ii, New Delhi v. J. Ray Mcdermott Middle East Inc, the High Court (2014) decided the matter.

Decision: The Appeal is, accordingly, disposed of.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITALINCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 27 OF 2011 Director Income Tax (International Taxation), Delhi-II, New Delhi. ……….Appellant. ……Respondent. Versus J. Ray McDermott Middle East Inc. Mr. Hari Mohan Bhatia, Advocate for the appellant. Mr. P.R. Mullick, Advocate for the respondent. Coram: Hon'ble Barin Ghosh, C.J.Hon'ble V.K. Bist, J. Barin Ghosh, C.J. (Oral) Agreement No. 70711 dated 15[th] August, 1995 entered by the assessee with Enron Oil and Gas India Ltd. required the assessee to carry out certain work outside India and to be remunerated in respect of such work outside India. It was so remunerated in one assessment year. The payment, so received, was included in the taxable liability of the assessee during that assessment year. The said assessment travelled to this Court in Income Tax Appeal No. 12 of 2007. This Court declared that the income derived from the said agreement entered outside India for providing administrative and support service outside India and, in respect whereof, remuneration has been received outside India will not come within Section 5(2), read with Section 9(1)(i) of the Indian Income Tax Act and is, accordingly, not taxable in India. A similar claim has been made by the Department against the assessee during another assessment year. That claim is the subject matter of the present Appeal. 2. For the reasons already indicated above, we delete that part of the inclusion, which was added in respect of the Agreement No. 70711 dated 15[th] August, 1995 for providing administrative and support service outside India and, in respect whereof, remuneration has been received outside India. It is made clear that claim of interest on that addition automatically will go. 3. The Appeal is, accordingly, disposed of. (V.K. Bist, J.) (Barin Ghosh, C.J.) 31.03.2014
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan