Case LawHigh Court › Director, Income Tax (International Taxa...

Director, Income Tax (International Taxation v. Dolphin Drilling Pvt. Ltd

High Court 28 Sep 2012 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · ukhcucis_pg
Parties
Director, Income Tax (International Taxation v. Dolphin Drilling Pvt. Ltd
Date of order
28 Sep 2012
Assessment year(s)
2005-2006, 2006-2007
Outcome
Allowed

Case summary

In Director, Income Tax (International Taxation v. Dolphin Drilling Pvt. Ltd, the High Court (2012) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Issue: Inasmuch as the matter pertaining to Assessment Year 2005-2006 did not reach finality, it was questioned whether the principles for assessment during the Assessment Year 2005-2006 could also be adopted for the Assessment Year 2006-2007.

Decision: The appeal is, accordingly, dismissed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Income Tax Appeal No. 2 of 2012WithDelay Condonation Application No. 1291 of 2012 Director, Income Tax (International Taxation). ………. Appellant Versus Dolphin Drilling Pvt. Ltd. ..………. Respondent Mr. H.M. Bhatia, Advocate holding brief of Mr. Arvind Vashishth, Advocate for the appellant. Mr. P.R. Mullick, Advocate for the respondent. JUDGMENT Coram: Hon’ble Barin Ghosh, C.J. Hon’ble U.C. Dhyani, J. BARIN GHOSH, C. J. (Oral) Learned counsel for the respondent has not objected to the Application for condonation of delay in preferring the appeal being allowed. We have considered the averments made in the Application for condonation of delay in preferring the appeal and, being satisfied with the sufficiency of reasons furnished therein, allow the same and condone the delay in preferring the appeal. 2. In this case, the Assessment Year was 2006-2007. That assessment was completed on the basis of a decision rendered for the Assessment Year 2005-2006. Inasmuch as the matter pertaining to Assessment Year 2005-2006 did not reach finality, it was questioned whether the principles for assessment during the Assessment Year 2005-2006 could also be adopted for the Assessment Year 2006-2007. The matter pertaining to Assessment Year 2005-2006 has, now, reached finality without any interference and against the Revenue. 3. In the circumstances, the question of law raised in the instant appeal stands answered against the Revenue. The appeal is, accordingly, dismissed. G (U.C. Dhyani, J.) (Barin Ghosh, C. J.) 28.09.2012 28.09.2012
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan