Case LawHigh Court › Director Income Tax (International Taxat...

Director Income Tax (International Taxation v. M/S Dolphin Drilling Pte. Ltd

High Court 26 Apr 2012 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · ukhcucis_pg
Parties
Director Income Tax (International Taxation v. M/S Dolphin Drilling Pte. Ltd
Date of order
26 Apr 2012
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Allowed

Case summary

In Director Income Tax (International Taxation v. M/S Dolphin Drilling Pte. Ltd, the High Court (2012) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Issue: In the present appeal, principal question is, whether depreciation should or should not be allowed from the date of availability of the plant and machinery, in the instant case Drilling ship, or the same should be allowed from the date of installation of the same.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITALINCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 57 of 2010 Director Income Tax (International Taxation) …….Appellant. Versus M/s Dolphin Drilling Pte. Ltd. Mr. Hari Mohan Bhatia, Advocate for the appellant. Mr. P.R. Mullick, Advocate for the respondent. …....Respondent Coram: Hon’ble Barin Ghosh, C.J.Hon’ble U.C. Dhyani, J. BARIN GHOSH, C.J. (ORAL) Mr. P.R. Mullick, Advocate appears on behalf of the respondent. He submits that he has instructions not to seriously object the application for condonation of delay (CLMA No. 6944 of 2010). We have considered the averments made in the application for condonation of delay of 54 days in preferring the appeal and being satisfied with the reasons furnished therein, allow the application and thereby condone the delay in preferring the appeal. 2. In the present appeal, principal question is, whether depreciation should or should not be allowed from the date of availability of the plant and machinery, in the instant case Drilling ship, or the same should be allowed from the date of installation of the same. This aspect of the matter has already been dealt with by this court in Director of Income Tax Vs. M/s Dolphin Drilling Pte. Ltd. (ITA No. 29 of 2011, decided on 19[th] April, 2012). In such view of the matter, we also answer the question of law, thus, raised in the light of the decision of this court rendered in the aforementioned decision of this Court and therefore dismiss the appeal. (U.C. Dhyani, J.) (Barin Ghosh, C.J.) 26.04.2012 26.04.2012 Rathour
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan