Director Of Income Tax & Another v. M/S B.g. Asia Pacific Holdings Ltd
High Court
28 Apr 2010 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · ukhcucis_pg
Parties
Director Of Income Tax & Another v. M/S B.g. Asia Pacific Holdings Ltd
Date of order
28 Apr 2010
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Director Of Income Tax & Another v. M/S B.g. Asia Pacific Holdings Ltd, the High Court (2010) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL
Income Tax Appeal No.08 of 2009
Director of Income Tax & another
…….. Appellants
Versus
M/s B.G. Asia Pacific Holdings Ltd.
....….. Respondent
Coram:- Hon’ble J.S. Khehar, Chief JusticeHon’ble Sudhanshu Dhulia, Judge
Present: Mr. Arvind Vashistha, Advocate for the appellants.
Date of Decision: 28.04.2010
J.S. Khehar, C.J. (Oral)
Learned counsel for the appellants states, that the impugned order dated 08.08.2008 was rendered by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal by relying on the judgment rendered by the Delhi High Court in Dr. Prannoy Roy and another versus Commissioner of Income Tax and another, (2002) 172 CTR 465. It is submitted, that the decision rendered by the Delhi High Court in the aforesaid case was assailed by the Revenue before the Apex Court and the appeal preferred by the revenue was dismissed on 17.09.2008. In this behalf, learned counsel for the appellants has invited the Court’s attention to the judgment rendered in Commissioner of Income Tax and another versus Pranoy Roy and another, 2009-(222)-CTR-6.
In view of the above, the instant appeal is dismissed in view of the judgment rendered by the Supreme Court in Commissioner of Income Tax and another versus Pranoy Roy and another, 2009-(222)-CTR-6.
P.Singh
( Sudhanshu Dhulia, J. ) ( J.S. Khehar, C.J.) 28.04.2010
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.