Case LawHigh Court › Director Of Income Tax & Another v. M/S...

Director Of Income Tax & Another v. M/S J. Ray Mc Dermott Middle East Inc

High Court 11 Dec 2012 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · ukhcucis_pg
Parties
Director Of Income Tax & Another v. M/S J. Ray Mc Dermott Middle East Inc
Date of order
11 Dec 2012
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In Director Of Income Tax & Another v. M/S J. Ray Mc Dermott Middle East Inc, the High Court (2012) decided the matter.

Decision: 12 of 2007, we also answer the issues in the same line and dismiss the appeal.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITALIncome Tax Appeal No. 184 of 2007 Director of Income Tax & another. ………. Appellants Versus M/s J. Ray MC Dermott Middle East Inc. ..………. Respondent Mr. Hari Mohan Bhatia, Advocate for the appellants. JUDGMENT Coram: Hon’ble Barin Ghosh, C.J. Hon’ble U.C. Dhyani, J. BARIN GHOSH, C. J. (Oral) The issues, raised in the present appeal, were also issues in Income Tax Appeal No. 12 of 2007 (Commissioner of Income Tax & another vs. J. Ray Mc. Dermott Middle East Inc.), which has been decided by the Division Bench of this Court on 20[th] November, 2012 against the appellants. 2. Following the ratio of the judgment rendered on 20[th] November, 2012 in Income Tax Appeal No. 12 of 2007, we also answer the issues in the same line and dismiss the appeal. P. Singh (U.C. Dhyani, J.) (Barin Ghosh, C. J.) 11.12.2012 11.12.2012
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan