Case LawHigh Court › Director Of Income Tax & Another v. M/S...

Director Of Income Tax & Another v. M/S Pride Foramer Sa

High Court 04 Dec 2013 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · ukhcucis_pg
Parties
Director Of Income Tax & Another v. M/S Pride Foramer Sa
Date of order
04 Dec 2013
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Allowed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Director Of Income Tax & Another v. M/S Pride Foramer Sa, the High Court (2013) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: 16 of 2009, the present appeal is also allowed and, to that extent, the judgment of the Tribunal is set aside.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Income Tax Appeal No. 21 of 2009 Director of Income Tax & another. .………. Appellants Versus M/s Pride Foramer SA. ..………. Respondent Mr. H.M. Bhatia, Advocate for the appellants. Mr. P.C. Petshali, Advocate, holding brief of Mr. L.K. Tiwari, Advocate for the respondent. JUDGMENT Coram: Hon’ble Barin Ghosh, C.J. Hon’ble Servesh Kumar Gupta, J. BARIN GHOSH, C. J. (Oral) The issue raised in the present appeal has been decided by this Court in ITA No. 16 of 2009. In the light of the observations made in our judgment rendered in ITA No. 16 of 2009, the present appeal is also allowed and, to that extent, the judgment of the Tribunal is set aside. G (Servesh Kumar Gupta, J.) 04.12.2013 (Barin Ghosh, C. J.) 04.12.2013
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan