Case LawHigh Court › Director Of Income Tax (E v. Prakash Edu...

Director Of Income Tax (E v. Prakash Educational Societythrough:none

High Court 22 Nov 2017 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · dhcdb
Parties
Director Of Income Tax (E v. Prakash Educational Societythrough:none
Date of order
22 Nov 2017
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Director Of Income Tax (E v. Prakash Educational Societythrough:none, the High Court (2017) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: The appeal is consequently dismissed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

$~3 *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ITA 1034/2017 DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX (E) ..... Appellant Through:Mr. Ruchir Bhatia and Mr. GauravKhetrapal, Advs. versus PRAKASH EDUCATIONAL SOCIETYThrough:None. ..... Respondent CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHATHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVAO R D E R%22.11.2017 CM No. 42251/2017 (condonation of delay) This appeal under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act ishighly belated and was re-filed after 1020 days. The application fordelay therefore cannot be entertained and is dismissed. ITA 1034/2017 The Court notices that the facts of this case are squarelycovered by the judgment of this Court in Director of Income Tax Vs.Vishwa Jagriti Mission, 73 DTR (Del) 195; where it was held that theincome in this case had to be treated as earned by the society/Trust setup for charitable purpose under Section 10(23C) read with Section 12A of the Income Tax Act. No substantial question of law thereforearises. The appeal is consequently dismissed. S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J NOVEMBER 22, 2017‘rs’ SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan