Case LawHigh Court › Director Of Income Tax (Exempt) Mumbai v...

Director Of Income Tax (Exempt) Mumbai v. M/S Parmanaddas Jivandas Hindu Gymkhana

High Court 07 Jul 2011 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Director Of Income Tax (Exempt) Mumbai v. M/S Parmanaddas Jivandas Hindu Gymkhana
Date of order
07 Jul 2011
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In Director Of Income Tax (Exempt) Mumbai v. M/S Parmanaddas Jivandas Hindu Gymkhana, the High Court (2011) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

rrt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONNOTICE OF MOTION NO. 610 OF 2011ININCOME TAX APPEAL NO.238 OF 2011 Director of Income Tax (Exempt) Mumbai..Appellant. Vs. M/s Parmanaddas Jivandas Hindu Gymkhana ..Respondent. Mr. Suresh Kumar, for the Appellant.Mr.D.Damodar i/b Kanga & Co, for the Respondent. CORAM : J.P. DEVADHAR AND A.A. SAYED, JJ.DATE : 7TH JULY, 2011. P.C. By consent, the notice of motion is made absolute in terms of prayers (a) & (b). ( A.A. SAYED, J. ) (J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan