Case Law › High Court › Director Of Income Tax (Exemption v. M/S...

Director Of Income Tax (Exemption v. M/S.goregaon Sports Club, Mumbai

High Court 31 Mar 2012 In favour of: Assessee

Forum / Bench

High Court · newos

Parties

Date of order

31 Mar 2012

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

Case summary

In Director Of Income Tax (Exemption v. M/S.goregaon Sports Club, Mumbai, the High Court (2012) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION REVIEW PETITION (L) NO.143 OF 2010 WITHINCOME TAX APPEAL NO.5338 OF 2010 Director of Income Tax (Exemption) Versus M/s.Goregaon Sports Club, Mumbai ..Appellant. ..Respondent. Mr.Suresh Kumar for the appellant.Mr.Narendra Kekseria, CA & Trustee of the respondent present. CORAM : J.P. Devadhar &A.R. Joshi, JJ. P.C. : DATE : 31[st] March 2012 1.By consent, the order dated 22[nd] July 2009 dismissing the appeal is recalled and Income Tax Appeal No.5338 of 2010 is restored back to the file. 2.By consent, the appeal is taken up for hearing. 3.Both the parties state that the question of law raised in this appeal is covered against the Revenue by the decision of this Court in the assessee's own case, being Income Tax Appeal No.6301 of 2010 decided on 14[th] February 2012. 4.In this view of the matter, the Income Tax Appeal No.5338 of 2010 is dismissed with no order as to costs.

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.