Case LawHigh Court › Director Of Income Tax (Exemption v. M/S...

Director Of Income Tax (Exemption v. M/S.worldwide Church Of God

High Court 25 Mar 2008 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Director Of Income Tax (Exemption v. M/S.worldwide Church Of God
Date of order
25 Mar 2008
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Director Of Income Tax (Exemption v. M/S.worldwide Church Of God, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Issue: The question of law formulated as under:- Substantial question of law arises in the present appeal is the correct interpretation of Section 11 and 13(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act and as to whether the assessee is eligible for exemption under Section 11 of the Act and the A.O. is justified in invoking...

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

The order — as passed by the High Court

(-1-) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION r NOTICE OF MOTION NO.882 OF 2005 WITH INCOME TAX APPEAL LODGING NO.415 OF 2005 Director of Income Tax (Exemption)...Appellant Vs. M/s.Worldwide Church of God........ Respondent Mr. P.S. Sahadevan for the Appellant. CORAM: F.I.REBELLO&R.S.MOHITE,JJ.DATED: 25TH MARCH, 2008 CORAM: F.I. R.S.MOHITE,JJ. DATED: 25TH MARCH, 2008 P.C.: P.C.: . There is a delay of 287 days. 2. The question of law formulated as under:- Substantial question of law arises in the present appeal is the correct interpretation of Section 11 and 13(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act and as to whether the assessee is eligible for exemption under Section 11 of the Act and the A.O. is justified in invoking the provisions of Section 13(1)(c) of the Act." 3. The Tribunal in so far as the remuneration paid to the three Trustees are concerned in the light of the finding recorded by the Commissioner (-2-) (Appeals) and similar amounts for services for the previous years were approved by the Revenue found that there was no substance in the action of the Assessing Officer and confirmed the findings of C.I.T. (Appeals). These are purely findings of fact and consequently the question to that extent would not arise. 4. In so far as the finding in the matter of receiving donation of Rs.4,27,800/- on capital account considering the finding by the C.I.T.(Appeals) confirmed the said finding namely that the donation was received for the purpose of purchase of a car after receiving permission from the Ministry of Home Affairs for the use by the Trustees and accordingly held that the C.I.T. (A) was right that there was no justification in making an addition of Rs.4,27,800/-. Similarly, the Tribunal confirmed the finding of the C.I.T. (A) in the matter of allowing depreciation. 5. These are purely findings of fact. The question of law as framed would not arise and consequently Notice of Motion along with Appeal dismissed. (R.S.MOHITE, J.) (R.S.MOHITE, J.)(F.I.REBELLO, J.) (F.I.REBELLO, J.) (R.S.MOHITE, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan