Director Of Income Tax (Exemption v. M/S.worldwide Church Of God
High Court
25 Mar 2008 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Director Of Income Tax (Exemption v. M/S.worldwide Church Of God
Date of order
25 Mar 2008
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Director Of Income Tax (Exemption v. M/S.worldwide Church Of God, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Issue: The question of law formulated as under:- Substantial question of law arises in the present appeal is the correct interpretation of Section 11 and 13(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act and as to whether the assessee is eligible for exemption under Section 11 of the Act and the A.O. is justified in invoking...
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
(-1-)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
r NOTICE OF MOTION NO.882 OF 2005
WITH
INCOME TAX APPEAL LODGING NO.415 OF 2005
Director of Income Tax (Exemption)...Appellant
Vs.
M/s.Worldwide Church of God........ Respondent
Mr. P.S. Sahadevan for the Appellant.
CORAM: F.I.REBELLO&R.S.MOHITE,JJ.DATED: 25TH MARCH, 2008
CORAM: F.I.
R.S.MOHITE,JJ.
DATED: 25TH MARCH, 2008
P.C.:
P.C.:
. There is a delay of 287 days.
2. The question of law formulated as under:-
Substantial question of law arises in the
present appeal is the correct interpretation
of Section 11 and 13(1)(c) of the Income Tax
Act and as to whether the assessee is
eligible for exemption under Section 11 of
the Act and the A.O. is justified in
invoking the provisions of Section 13(1)(c)
of the Act."
3. The Tribunal in so far as the remuneration
paid to the three Trustees are concerned in the
light of the finding recorded by the Commissioner
(-2-)
(Appeals) and similar amounts for services for the
previous years were approved by the Revenue found
that there was no substance in the action of the
Assessing Officer and confirmed the findings of
C.I.T. (Appeals). These are purely findings of
fact and consequently the question to that extent
would not arise.
4. In so far as the finding in the matter of
receiving donation of Rs.4,27,800/- on capital
account considering the finding by the
C.I.T.(Appeals) confirmed the said finding namely
that the donation was received for the purpose of
purchase of a car after receiving permission from
the Ministry of Home Affairs for the use by the
Trustees and accordingly held that the C.I.T. (A)
was right that there was no justification in making
an addition of Rs.4,27,800/-. Similarly, the
Tribunal confirmed the finding of the C.I.T. (A) in
the matter of allowing depreciation.
5. These are purely findings of fact. The
question of law as framed would not arise and
consequently Notice of Motion along with Appeal
dismissed.
(R.S.MOHITE, J.)
(R.S.MOHITE, J.)(F.I.REBELLO, J.)
(F.I.REBELLO, J.)
(R.S.MOHITE, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.